Ortiz v. Uribe, Jr., No. 09-55264 (9th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePetitioner appealed from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254, claiming that his due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated based on the admission of his confession. The court held that the district court did not err in upholding the California Court of Appeal's determination that the totality of the circumstances demonstrated that petitioner's will was not overcome and that his confessions to one detective and subsequently to two others were voluntary. Accordingly, the judgment was affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.