Solomon Farr v. Solano County, No. 09-16587 (9th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED AUG 27 2010 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SOLOMON FARR, No. 09-16587 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02974-GGH v. MEMORANDUM * SOLANO COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate Judge, Presiding ** Submitted August 10, 2010 *** Before: O SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Solomon Farr, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** Appellant consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Appellee has not appeared in this action. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Procedure 60(b) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Farr failed to establish grounds for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b). See id. at 1263 (listing grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)). AFFIRMED. 2 09-16587

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.