NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION V. EDMUND BROWN, No. 09-15483 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 31, 2010.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; EDMUND G. BROWN JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants-Appellants, and THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES; FARM SANCTUARY, INC.; HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Defendant-Intervenors. 6563    No. 09-15483 D.C. No. 1:08-cv-01963LJO-DLB 6564 NATIONAL MEAT ASS N v. BROWN NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; EDMUND G. BROWN JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants, and THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES; FARM SANCTUARY, INC.; HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Defendants-IntervenorsAppellants.   No. 09-15486 D.C. No. 1:08-cv-01963LJO-DLB ORDER  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed June 8, 2012 Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges. ORDER In light of the United States Supreme Court s decision in National Meat Ass n v. Harris, 132 S. Ct. 965 (2012), we NATIONAL MEAT ASS N v. BROWN 6565 vacate our prior opinion in National Meat Ass n v. Brown, 599 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2010), and affirm the judgment of the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b). PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2012 Thomson Reuters.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
