Evvers Guevara-Moreno v. Eric H. Holder Jr., No. 08-72110 (9th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED SEP 21 2010 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EVVERS RAFAEL GUEVARAMORENO, No. 08-72110 Agency No. A036-064-070 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM * v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Evvers Rafael Guevara-Moreno, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( BIA ) decision vacating an immigration judge s ( IJ ) decision granting cancellation of removal. Our * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Brezilien v. Holder, 569 F.3d 403, 411 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. The BIA denied cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion and this court lacks jurisdiction to review such discretionary decisions. Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 2003). Guevara-Moreno s contention that the BIA exceeded its authority by engaging in fact-finding is not persuasive because the BIA reversed the IJ s decision as a matter of discretion, based on the facts found by the IJ, and did not find new facts. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) ( The Board may review questions of law, discretion, and judgment and all other issues in appeals from decisions of immigration judges de novo. ). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 08-72110

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.