Anthony Sharp v. Joseph Bick, No. 08-16648 (9th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã »¬·¬·±²»® Ã³ Ã °°»´´¿²¬Ã´ ªÃ² Ã Ã Ã Ã°Ã§ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã° Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ±Ã² Ã°Ã¨Ã³Ã¯ÃªÃªÃ¬Ã¨ Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã ±Ã² Ã®Ã¦Ã°Ã¨Ã³Ã Ã Ã³Ã°Ã°Ã¬Ã¬ÃÃ³Ã Ã Ã Ã ¿-¬»®² Ã ·-¬®·½¬ ±º Ã ¿´·º±®²·¿Ã´ Ã ¿½®¿³»²¬± Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã »-°±²¼»²¬ Ã³ Ã °°»´´»»Ã² Ã »º±®»Ã¦ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ ¿²¼ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ·®½«·¬ Ã «¼¹»-Ã² Ã ²¬¸±²§ Ã ²¼®» Ã ¸¿®°Å½- °»¬·¬·±² º±® °¿²»´ ®»¸»¿®·²¹ ·- ¹®¿²¬»¼Ã² Ã ¸» ³»³±®¿²¼«³ ¼·-°±-·¬·±² º·´»¼ ±² Ã »°¬»³¾»® Ã¯Ã´ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã°Ã´ ·- ©·¬¸¼®¿©²Ã² Ã ² ¿³»²¼»¼ ³»³±®¿²¼«³ ¼·-°±-·¬·±² ©·´´ ¾» º·´»¼ ½±²½«®®»²¬´§ ©·¬¸ ¬¸·- ±®¼»®Ã² Ã ± º«®¬¸»® °»¬·¬·±²- º±® ®»¸»¿®·²¹ ©·´´ ¾» »²¬»®¬¿·²»¼Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã°Ã§ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã° Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ±Ã² Ã°Ã¨Ã³Ã¯ÃªÃªÃ¬Ã¨ Ã »¬·¬·±²»® Ã³ Ã °°»´´¿²¬Ã´ Ã Ã²Ã Ã² Ã ±Ã² Ã®Ã¦Ã°Ã¨Ã³Ã Ã Ã³Ã°Ã°Ã¬Ã¬ÃÃ³Ã Ã Ã ªÃ² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã¶ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã »-°±²¼»²¬ Ã³ Ã °°»´´»»Ã² Ã °°»¿´ º®±³ ¬¸» Ã ²·¬»¼ Ã ¬¿¬»- Ã ·-¬®·½¬ Ã ±«®¬ º±® ¬¸» Ã ¿-¬»®² Ã ·-¬®·½¬ ±º Ã ¿´·º±®²·¿ Ã ¿®´¿²¼ Ã Ã² Ã «®®»´´Ã´ Ã ·-¬®·½¬ Ã «¼¹»Ã´ Ã ®»-·¼·²¹ Ã «¾³·¬¬»¼ Ã «¹«-¬ Ã¯Ã°Ã´ Ã®Ã°Ã¯Ã°Ã¶Ã¶ Ã »º±®»Ã¦ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ ¿²¼ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã´ Ã ·®½«·¬ Ã «¼¹»-Ã² Ã ²¬¸±²§ Ã ²¼®» Ã ¸¿®° ¿°°»¿´- °®± -» ¬¸» ¼·-³·--¿´ ±º ¸·- °»¬·¬·±² º±® ®»³±ª¿´ ±º ¿ Ã ¿´·º±®²·¿ -¬¿¬» ½±«®¬ ¿½¬·±² ¬± º»¼»®¿´ ½±«®¬Ã² Ã » ¸¿ª» ¶«®·-¼·½¬·±² Ã¶ Ã ¸·- ¼·-°±-·¬·±² ·- ²±¬ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» º±® °«¾´·½¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ·- ²±¬ °®»½»¼»²¬ »¨½»°¬ ¿- °®±ª·¼»¼ ¾§ Ã§¬¸ Ã ·®Ã² Ã Ã² ÃÃªÃ³ÃÃ² Ã¶Ã¶ Ã ¸» °¿²»´ «²¿²·³±«-´§ ½±²½´«¼»- ¬¸·- ½¿-» ·- -«·¬¿¾´» º±® ¼»½·-·±² ©·¬¸±«¬ ±®¿´ ¿®¹«³»²¬Ã² Ã »» Ã »¼Ã² Ã Ã² Ã °°Ã² Ã Ã² ÃÃ¬Ã¸¿Ã·Ã¸Ã®Ã·Ã² Ã¯ «²¼»® Ã®Ã¨ Ã Ã²Ã Ã²Ã Ã² y Ã¯Ã®Ã§Ã¯Ã´ ¿²¼ ©» ¿ºº·®³Ã²Ã¯ Ã ¸¿®° ½±²¬»²¼- ¬¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬ »®®»¼ ¾§ ¼»²§·²¹ ¸·- °»¬·¬·±² º±® ®»³±ª¿´ ¾»½¿«-» ¬¸» -¬¿¬» ½±«®¬ ¿²¼ -¬¿¬» ±ºº·½·¿´- ¿®» ª·±´¿¬·²¹ ¸·- ½±²-¬·¬«¬·±²¿´ ®·¹¸¬-Ã² Ã » ¿ºº·®³ ¬¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬Å½- ½±²½´«-·±² ¬¸¿¬Ã´ ¿- ¬¸» °´¿·²¬·ºº ·² ¬¸» «²¼»®´§·²¹ -¬¿¬» ½±«®¬ ¿½¬·±²Ã´ Ã ¸¿®° ½¿²²±¬ ®»³±ª» ¬¸» ½¿-» ¬± º»¼»®¿´ ½±«®¬Ã² Ã »» Ã®Ã¨ Ã Ã²Ã Ã²Ã Ã² y Ã¯Ã¬Ã¬ÃªÃ¸¿Ã·Ã¥ -»» ¿´-± Ã ³»®·½¿² Ã ²¬Å½´ Ã ²¼»®©®·¬»®-Ã´ Ã¸Ã ¸·´·°°·²»-Ã·Ã´ Ã ²½Ã² ªÃ² Ã ±²¬·²»²¬¿´ Ã ²-Ã² Ã ±Ã²Ã´ Ã¨Ã¬Ã Ã Ã²Ã®¼ Ã¯Ã®Ã«ÃÃ´ Ã¯Ã®ÃªÃ° Ã¸Ã§¬¸ Ã ·®Ã² Ã¯Ã§Ã¨Ã¨Ã· Ã¸ ¢Ã ¸» ®·¹¸¬ ¬± ®»³±ª» ¿ -¬¿¬» ½±«®¬ ½¿-» ¬± º»¼»®¿´ ½±«®¬ ·- ½´»¿®´§ ´·³·¬»¼ ¬± ¼»º»²¼¿²¬-Ã²Å Ã·Ã² Ã ¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬Ã´ ¿º¬»® ·¬ ¼»²·»¼ ®»³±ª¿´Ã´ ©¿- ©·¬¸±«¬ ¶«®·-¼·½¬·±² ¬± ¼·-³·-- Ã ¸¿®°Å½- ¿½¬·±²Ã´ ¿²¼ º«®¬¸»® »®®»¼ ·² º¿·´·²¹ ¬± ®»³¿²¼ ¬± ¬¸» -¬¿¬» ½±«®¬Ã² Ã »» Ã®Ã¨ Ã Ã²Ã Ã²Ã Ã² y Ã¯Ã¬Ã¬Ã©Ã¸½Ã·Ã² Ã » ®»ª»®-» ¬¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬Å½- ±®¼»® ¼·-³·--·²¹ ©·¬¸±«¬ °®»¶«¼·½»Ã´ ¿²¼ ©» ®»³¿²¼ ©·¬¸ ·²-¬®«½¬·±²- ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬ ®»³¿²¼ Ã ¸¿®°Å½¿½¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» Ã ¿½®¿³»²¬± Ã ±«²¬§ Ã «°»®·±® Ã ±«®¬Ã² Ã ´´ °»²¼·²¹ ³±¬·±²- ¿®» ¼»²·»¼Ã² Ã ¿½¸ °¿®¬§ ¬± ¾»¿® ·¬- ±©² ½±-¬- ±² ¿°°»¿´Ã² Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ·² °¿®¬Ã´ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ·² °¿®¬Ã´ ¿²¼ Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã ©·¬¸ ·²-¬®«½¬·±²-Ã² Ã¯ Ã ±® ¬¸» ®»¿-±²- -¬¿¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ¼·-¬®·½¬ ½±«®¬Å½- Ã «´§ Ã¯Ã«Ã´ Ã®Ã°Ã°Ã¨Ã´ ±®¼»®Ã´ ¿ ½»®¬·º·½¿¬» ±º ¿°°»¿´¿¾·´·¬§ ·- «²²»½»--¿®§ ·² ¬¸·- ½¿-»Ã² Ã®

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.