Hernandez Martinez, et al v. Mukasey, No. 06-71010 (9th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED SEP 21 2010 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GLORIA HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ, Petitioner, No. 06-71010 Agency No. A079-544-164 v. MEMORANDUM * MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Gloria Hernandez Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge s denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her qualifying relatives. Hernandez Martinez contends that the agency erred in finding that her qualifying relatives will not suffer hardship if she is removed. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See MartinezRosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 06-71010

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.