HEPTING V AT&T CORPORTATION, No. 06-17131 (9th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor. 14985 ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 06-17132 D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW 14986 HEPTING v. AT&T CORP. TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-IntervenorAppellant. AL-HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION, INC., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation; WENDELL BELEW, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law; ASIM GHAFOOR, a U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 06-17137 D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW ï£¾ ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 06-36083 D.C. Nos. MDL-CV-06-1791VRW CV-07-00109-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER HEPTING v. AT&T CORP. 14987 Filed November 16, 2007 Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. ORDER On April 26, 2007, Al-Haramain v. Bush, No. 06-36083, was consolidated with Hepting v. AT&T Corp., Nos. 0617132, 06-17137. The Clerk shall sever Al-Haramain v. Bush, No. 06-36083, from Hepting v. AT&T Corp., Nos. 06-17132, 06-17137, and the cases shall no longer be consolidated for any purpose. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.