USA V PLOUFFE, No. 05-30045 (9th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER RAY PLOUFFE, Defendant-Appellant. ï£¼ ï£½ ï£¾ No. 05-30045 D.C. No. CR-04-00013-3SEH District of Montana, Great Falls ORDER Filed February 13, 2006 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge. ORDER The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs addressing whether the court has jurisdiction to review the reasonableness of Appellant s sentence, which is within the Guidelines range, in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005); our pre-Booker precedent such as United States v. Reed, 914 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Pelayo-Bautista, 907 F.2d 99 (9th Cir. 1990); and the holding of Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The parties are directed to file simultaneous letter briefs on or before fifteen (15) days from the filed date of this order. The briefs shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages (double-spaced) *The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 1631 1632 UNITED STATES v. PLOUFFE or 4,200 words and may be in the form of letters to the clerk of this court. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.