EDWARD JONES V CITY OF LOS ANGELES, No. 04-55324 (9th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON; GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH; STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE PURRIE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK, Captain, in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. ï£¼ ï£½ No. 04-55324 D.C. No. CV-03-01142-ER Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER ï£¾ Filed October 15, 2007 Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge. ORDER The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent *The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. 14139 14140 JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.