United States v. Russell Jackson, No. 23-2536 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Shepherd, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Order denying defendant's pro se motion for return of property under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2536 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Russell Kimble Jackson, also known as Russell Kimble Jackson, V lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: November 20, 2023 Filed: November 30, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Russell Jackson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his pro se motion for return of property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g). Following a 1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. See Jackson v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 398 (8th Cir. 2008) (after denial of Rule 41(g) motion, this court reviews district court’s legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
