Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi, No. 22-3632 (8th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Shepherd, and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. Order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-3632 ___________________________ Charles L. Burgett lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: July 26, 2023 Filed: August 1, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. Upon careful 1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Burgett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. See Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818, 827 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
