United States v. Jeffrey Ostdiek, No. 21-3900 (8th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Colloton, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case. This pro se appeal fails to identify any error committed by the district court or provide any argument for reversal, and the district court's judgment is affirmed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3900 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jeffrey Thomas Ostdiek lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: August 4, 2022 Filed: August 5, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Ostdiek appeals pro se following the district court’s1 judgment of conviction in his criminal case. We conclude that he has failed to identify any error 1 The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. committed by the district court, and that he has failed to otherwise provide any argument for reversal. See Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc., 908 F.3d 313, 324 (8th Cir. 2018); United States v. Gonzales, 90 F.3d 1363, 1369-70 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
