Quintin Ray v. Renaissance St. Louis Airport, No. 20-1785 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Erickson, Wollman and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. [ November 25, 2020 ]
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1785 ___________________________ Quintin Ray lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Renaissance St. Louis Airport Hotel, (Schulte Hospitality Group) lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: November 23, 2020 Filed: November 30, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this Title VII action, Quintin Ray appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for reconsideration. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its 1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. discretion. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (Rule 60(b) authorizes relief only in most exceptional cases). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
