United States v. Casey Jackson, No. 20-1443 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender, and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil commitment. The order committing defendant for hospitalization and treatment under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4246 was supported by the medical opinions in the record, including that of defendant's independent psychological examiner, and the order is affirmed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1443 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Casey Duante Jackson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________ Submitted: October 22, 2020 Filed: October 28, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Casey Jackson appeals the district court’s1 order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization and treatment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (authorizing commitment when releasing a person who suffers from a mental disease or defect would create a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious damage to property). We conclude the factual determinations underlying the district court’s commitment decision were not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676-78 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). The commitment order is supported by medical opinions set forth in reports prepared by mental health professionals where Jackson is presently confined for treatment, and by defense counsel’s independent psychological examiner. See United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (listing suggested factors in determining potential dangerousness). We note that the Attorney General is under a continuing obligation to exert reasonable efforts to place Jackson in a suitable state facility, and that his custodians must prepare annual reports concerning his mental condition and the need for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d) and 4247(e)(1)(B). The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
