Michael Sayen v. Gary Schurrer, No. 19-2360 (8th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Beam and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment. [ January 29, 2020 ]
This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 29, 2020.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2360 ___________________________ Michael S. Sayen lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gary R. Schurrer, in his individual capacity; John C. Hoffman, in his individual capacity; Thaddeus V. Jude lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: January 22, 2020 Filed: January 30, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Michael Sayen appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 1112 (1991) (per curiam) (discussing judicial immunity); see also Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 463 (2006) (lower federal courts are precluded from exercising appellate jurisdiction over final state court judgments). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
