Ricky Holifield v. Tom Roy, No. 18-3291 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam. Before Colloton, Wollman, and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Prisoner Case - Habeas Corpus. District court's determination that the state court properly assessed and rejected claims of ineffective assistance of counsel is summarily affirmed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3291 ___________________________ Ricky Donell Holifield lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. Commissioner Tom Roy lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: July 30, 2019 Filed: August 2, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Ricky Holifield, who was sentenced to 108 months in prison after a Minnesota jury found him guilty of second-degree sale of drugs, see State v. Holifield, No. A15-0899, 2016 WL 7439083 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2016) (unpublished opinion), appeals the district court’s1 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Because we agree with the district court that the Minnesota Court of Appeals properly applied Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), in assessing and rejecting Holifield’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, we affirm for the reasons relied on by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
