United States v. Daniel McNabb, No. 18-3250 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Arnold and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's appeal of the length of the sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release was moot in light of his release.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3250 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Daniel J. McNabb lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: September 23, 2019 Filed: October 9, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In 2005, Daniel J. McNabb was sentenced to 180 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release after he pled guilty to the manufacture of a controlled substance and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. After he completed his prison sentence, McNabb admittedly violated the conditions of his supervised release. The district court revoked his release, sentencing him to five months of imprisonment and 55 months of supervised release. McNabb appealed the sentence, challenging only the propriety of the prison sentence. During the pendency of his appeal, McNabb completed his sentence and was released from federal custody. In light of McNabb’s release from custody, “the appeal of the length of his sentence is moot.” United States v. Hill, 889 F.3d 953, 954 (8th Cir. 2018). We therefore dismiss the appeal. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
