Mark Targowski v. Zachary Rawlins, No. 18-2878 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendant's jury verdict affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2878 ___________________________ Mark Targowski lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., originally named as Super 8 Batesville, doing business as Super 8 Batesville; Larry Woods; Independence County, Arkansas lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants Zachary Lee Rawlins lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee John Does, 1-4, In their Individual and Official Capacity; S&S Hospitality 2, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville ____________ Submitted: September 3, 2019 Filed: September 9, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Mark Targowski appeals the judgment entered by the district court1 following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting Fourth Amendment claims. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Patterson v. City of Omaha, 779 F.3d 795, 801 (8th Cir. 2015) (explaining that, when assessing the findings of the jury, this Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, assuming as true all facts that the prevailing party’s evidence tended to prove); Craig Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc., 528 F.3d 1001, 1009 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a jury verdict is entitled to extreme deference and will not be set aside unless no reasonable jury could have reached the same verdict based on the evidence submitted). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
