United States v. Anguiano, No. 18-2154 (8th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThe Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence on the ground that his arrest and subsequent searches of his hotel room and vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The court held that the evidence taken as a whole provided ample support for the district court's finding that the officers would have applied for a warrant without the illegal search. The court also held that there was also probable cause to support issuance of the search warrant even without information gleaned from the initial search.
Court Description: Colloton, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The record as a whole provides ample support for the district court's finding that the officers would have applied for a warrant without the fruits of an illegal search; there was probable cause to support issuance of a search warrant even without the information gleaned from the initial suppressed search.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.