Randal Mauderer v. Iowa Attorney General's Office, No. 16-3866 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Loken, Circuit Judge] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Dismissal affirmed without comment. [ March 27, 2017
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3866 ___________________________ Randal Mauderer lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Iowa Attorney General’s Office, et al. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: March 23, 2017 Filed: March 28, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Randal Mauderer appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he alleged that his recommended participation in a Sex 1 The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. Offender Treatment Program violated his constitutional rights; and that the conditions of his exercise privileges while in segregation violated both his constitutional rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A(b) dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the appellate motions. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
