Charles Ivey v. Carolyn W. Colvin, No. 16-3342 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Murphy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. Denial of benefits affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3342 ___________________________ Charles N. Ivey lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison ____________ Submitted: April 3, 2017 Filed: July 5, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. 1 Nancy A. Berryhill has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). Charles N. Ivey appeals the order of the district court2 affirming the Commissioner’s determination that he is not entitled to disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, after his hearing before an administrative law judge. Upon de novo review, see Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we are satisfied that the decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 2 The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
