Charles Benjamin v. Ward County, No. 16-2640 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Arnold and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendant's summary judgment on plaintiff's deliberate-indifference to medical needs claim arising out of his pretrial detention in the Ward County Jail affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2640 ___________________________ Charles Benjamin, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Ward County, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck ____________ Submitted: February 22, 2017 Filed: February 27, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Charles Benjamin appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his Fourteenth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against Ward County, North Dakota, arising out of his pretrial detention in the Ward County Jail. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was warranted because Benjamin’s assertion of a custom, giving rise to Ward County’s liability, failed as a matter of law. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Riehm v. Engelking, 538 F.3d 952, 962-63 (8th Cir. 2008) (county liability requires custom or policy); Mettler v. Whitledge, 165 F.3d 1197, 1204 (8th Cir. 1999) (discussing standard for showing existence of custom); see also Polk Cty. v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981) (§ 1983 will not support claim based on respondeat superior theory of liability). We also conclude that Benjamin could not survive summary judgment by relying upon a failure-to-train theory of liability. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 388-89 (1989) (discussing standard for failure-to-train liability under § 1983). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Charles S. Miller, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
