United States v. Soliz, No. 16-2161 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his 235 month sentence after pleading guilty to possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. The Eighth Circuit affirmed, holding that the district court committed no procedural error where it specifically addressed the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors raised by defendant; the within-Guidelines sentence was presumptively reasonable; and the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant where the sentencing practices of one district court are not a reference point for other courts.
Court Description: Benton, Author, with Colloton and Beam, Circuit Judges] Criminal Case - sentencing. District court did not procedurally err in granting sentence at low end of guidelines range after granting downward variance and considering the section 3553(a) factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing, as defendant acted alone and thus there were no sentencing disparities between co-conspirators and disagreements with practices of other district court does not demonstrate abuse of discretion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.