Ramon Tomas v. Loretta E. Lynch, No. 16-2016 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Arnold and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Substantial evidence supports the decision to deny withholding of removal and CAT relief, and the decision is affirmed without further comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2016 ___________________________ Ramon Tino Tomas lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: January 13, 2017 Filed: January 19, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Ramon Tino Tomas petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge to deny withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. After careful consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision. See De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379, 381-82 (8th Cir. 2013). The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. _________________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
