Margots Kapacs v. Anita Jurevica, No. 16-1885 (8th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Dismissal of Section 1983 and RICO claim affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1885 ___________________________ Margots Kapacs lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Anita Jurevica, et al. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: February 7, 2017 Filed: February 9, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Margots Kapacs appeals after the district court1 dismissed his pro se complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt 1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. Organizations Act. Upon careful review, we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
