United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson, No. 16-1214 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not abuse its discretion by adding a special condition to defendant's supervision requiring him to reside in a residential reentry center for up to 120 days. [ June 07, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1214 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Eldon Philip Anderson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul ____________ Submitted: June 3, 2016 Filed: June 8, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Eldon Anderson appeals the district court’s1 order modifying his supervised release conditions to add a special condition that he reside for a period of up to 120 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. days in a residential reentry center, as approved by his probation officer. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in adding the condition, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2); and additionally, we decline to consider Anderson’s attempt, in his pro se submissions before us, to collaterally attack his underlying conviction, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
