United States v. Rashad McKay, No. 16-1048 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Order denying defendant a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582(c)(2) affirmed without comment. [ July 21, 2016
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1048 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Rashad McKay, also known as Rashod McKay lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: July 19, 2016 Filed: July 22, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Rashad McKay appeals after the district court1 denied him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(2). Following careful de novo review, see United States 1 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. v. Long, 757 F.3d 762, 763 (8th Cir. 2014), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
