Amie Reeves v. Carolyn W. Colvin, No. 15-3289 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Smith, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. District court judgment affirmed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-3289 ___________________________ Amie Reeves lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: May 24, 2016 Filed: May 27, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Amie Reeves appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Upon de novo 1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. review, see Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we conclude that the two narrow issues Ms. Reeves identifies do not provide a basis for reversing the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that she is not disabled. To warrant remand, a claimant must show prejudice from an error during administrative proceedings, see Samons v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 813, 821 (8th Cir. 2007); and an ALJ’s failure to cite certain evidence does not indicate that the evidence was not considered, see Craig v. Apfel, 212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
