Larson v. Ferrellgas Partners, No. 15-2789 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePlaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of their claims for damages in their action against Ferrellgas and AmeriGas under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants acted in concert to reduce the amount of propane contained within pre-filled propane tanks while maintaining the same price per tank, and thus artificially increasing the price of the tanks. Here, plaintiffs allege that reduction in fill levels, and thus the effective price increase, occurred in 2008, almost immediately after defendants reached the unlawful agreement. Plaintiffs have not alleged any overt acts within the four year limitations period that were new and independent acts, uncontrolled by the initial agreement. Therefore, the court concluded that plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and the court's conclusion reflects the objectives of Congress in encouraging timely lawsuits for the public good. The court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Antitrust. In action alleging defendants had acted in concert to reduce the amount of propane placed in pre-filled propane exchange tanks while maintaining the same price per tank, thus artificially increasing the price of the tanks, the district court did not err in finding plaintiffs' claims are barred by the four-year statute of limitations provision in the Sherman Act. Judge Benton, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.