Aaron Olson v. United States Post Office, No. 15-2654 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Loken, Murphy and Bye, Circuit Judges] Civil case. Dismissal of complaint alleging assault by a postal worker affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2654 ___________________________ Aaron Olson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States Post Office lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: March 1, 2016 Filed: March 4, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Minnesota resident Aaron Olson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se complaint alleging that he was assaulted by a postal worker, and the court’s denial of his motion to amend the complaint. After careful de novo review, see In re NVE Corp. Sec. Litig., 527 F.3d 749, 752 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review of denial of motion to amend complaint based on futility); Riley v. United States, 486 F.3d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), we conclude that dismissal was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
