Archie Bear v. Tracy Dietsch, No. 15-1800 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Smith, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. The district court did not err in granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiff's free exercise and equal protection claims.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1800 ___________________________ Archie Bear lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant Duane Yates; Alex Tejeda; Tahjah Shepard; Michael Ferguson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs v. Tracy Dietsch; John Fayram; John Baldwin; Cindy Wolmutt; Richard Jenkins; Sheryl Dahm; Stephen Salviati lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Thomas Miller, Iowa Attorney General; All Other Similarly Situated Individuals, within the Iowa Department of Corrections lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: January 22, 2016 Filed: January 26, 2016 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Archie Bear appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. On appeal, he maintains that Iowa officials--by enforcing a policy that affected inmate access to religious services--violated his free exercise and equal protection rights, and violated a state statute. Regarding the free exercise claim, we note that Mr. Bear’s complaint did not specify his faith, his beliefs under his faith, or how the policy in question conflicted with his beliefs. Regarding his equal protection claim, we note that there was no evidence in the record indicating that differences in treatment were motivated by intentional or purposeful discrimination. Thus, upon careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. See Brooks v. Roy, 776 F.3d 957, 960 (8th Cir. 2015) (discussing free exercise claims); Patel v. U.S. Bur. of Prisons, 515 F.3d 807, 815-16 (8th Cir. 2008) (discussing equal protection claims); Weir v. Nix, 114 F.3d 817, 821 n.7 (8th Cir. 1997) (violation of state statute, without more, is insufficient to establish § 1983 claim); see also Fullington v. Pfizer, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 747 (8th Cir. 2013) (court of appeals may affirm for any reason supported by record). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
