Grasso Enter. v. Express Scripts, No. 15-1578 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePlaintiffs filed suit, alleging that ESI is systematically denying payment of compound drug claims without adhering to the procedural requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act's "Claims Regulation." 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. The court concluded that there is no need for injunctive relief under section 502(a)(3), or for equitable relief to enforce or clarify the beneficiary’s rights under the plan under section 502(a)(1)(B). In this case, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the preliminary injunction requested by plaintiffs as assignees of plan beneficiaries because plaintiffs have cited no reported decision, and the court has found none, where a circuit court has upheld a private plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief mandating the future procedures an ERISA plan must follow to comply with the Claims Regulation. In the alternative, the court concluded that plaintiffs do not have standing under ERISA to assert harm to themselves because they are not ERISA beneficiaries. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Loken, Author, with Beam and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - ERISA. After Express Scripts denied payment of compound drug claims pursuant to a revised program for paying compounding pharmacies, the compounding pharmacies brought suit against Express Scripts for failing to adhere to procedural requirements of ERISA's claim regulation and sought a preliminary injunction. In this interlocutory appeal, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction. Plan beneficiaries have an adequate remedy at law and there is no need for injunctive relief under section 502(a)(3) or for equitable relief under section 502(a)(1)(B). Alternatively, the compounding pharmacies lack standing under ERISA to assert harm to themselves, as they are not "beneficiaries" and are not entitled to the procedures established by thee claims regulations. The district court's order denying a preliminary injunction is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.