United States v. Johnson, No. 14-3506 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his sentence of 27 months in prison after pleading guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for a downward variance, ultimately citing defendant’s multiple felony convictions and an outstanding warrant for failure to appear on a probation violation as the basis for its decision to deny the request and impose a within-Guidelines sentence. Further, the sentence imposed by the district court, on the low end of the properly-calculated Guidelines range, was not substantively unreasonable. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Court Description: Per Curiam - Before Murphy, Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in denying defendant's request for downward variance based on an argument that his criminal history was overstated and the sentence imposed was not substantively unreasonable.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.