Terry Johnson v. Vince Edwards, No. 14-3241 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Title VII. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ April 17, 2015
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-3241 ___________________________ Terry N. Johnson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mr. Vince Edwards, Branch Contract Manager; Mr. Phillip O’Donnell, Operations Contract Manager; Mr. Josh Goosen, Contract Manager; Miss Denise Rollerson, Dispatcher; Miss McGee, Principal and employee of O.P.S.; Mr. Raymond Burt, Lead Dispatcher; First Student lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Mrs. Kristyn J. Huening; Mr. Willie; two ladies; Mr. Mike Murray; Mr. Daniel W. Avelyn; Mrs. Nancy D. Powers; Mr. Shawn; Mr. Travis Sallis; Doctor Bartee; Mrs. Patty Rast; Mrs. Shirley Carlson; Mrs. Stacia Cofey; Mrs. Linda; Miss Shelley Foss; Miss Michelle; Mr. Joseph Wilson; Mr. Larry Marsh; Miss Kris Rose; Mr. Bryan; Miss Kristal lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: April 13, 2015 Filed: April 20, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Terry Johnson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action. Upon careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844, 852-55 (8th Cir. 2012) (affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs’ Title VII claims of race discrimination where evidence was insufficient to create genuine issue for trial); Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Johnson’s pending motion. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
