United States v. James Glasgow, No. 13-3725 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was substantively reasonable.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3725 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. James Ricky Glasgow, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________ Submitted: May 23, 2014 Filed: June 5, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. James Glasgow directly appeals the sentence that the district court1 imposed upon revoking his probation. For reversal, he argues that the sentence is 1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence-which is well within statutory limits, and is also within the Chapter 7 advisory Guidelines range applicable to revocation sentences--is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel s motion for leave to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
