Lennie Senter v. Stericycle, Inc., No. 13-3511 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Employment discrimination. Defendant's judgment on plaintiff's claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VII affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3511 ___________________________ Lennie R. Senter lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Stericycle, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: July 7, 2014 Filed: July 11, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc. 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. (Stericycle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met its burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter s claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VII. See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir. 2009). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
