United States v. Jaime Esquivel, No. 13-3426 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case. Defendant's motion for review of his sentence amounted to an unauthorized successive habeas motion and the district court did not err in denying it.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3426 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jaime Lamon Esquivel lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln ____________ Submitted: April 21, 2014 Filed: May 6, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jaime Esquivel appeals the district court s1 denial of his motion for review of his sentence. After careful review, we conclude that the motion 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. amounted to an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (authorization requirements); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034, 1036 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (inmates cannot bypass authorization requirement of § 2255 by purporting to invoke some other procedure). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
