United States v. Rodriguez-Valencia, No. 13-3247 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. On appeal, defendant argued that the six-and-a-half-year delay between indictment and arrest violated the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. The court concluded that defendant's speedy trial claim failed because the government pursued him with reasonable diligence from indictment to arrest and defendant failed to show actual or specific prejudice. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Where there was a six and a half year delay between defendant's indictment and arrest, the delay was not caused by the government's negligence as the government pursued defendant with reasonable diligence; further, defendant has not shown any actual or specific prejudice caused by the delay, and his speedy trial claim fails.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.