Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium, No. 13-3180 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Labor law. Defendants' summary judgment on plaintiff's claims under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act and Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act is affirmed without comment. [ April 09, 2014
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3180 ___________________________ Hunter R. Levi lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium, & Its Wholly Owned U.S. Subsidiary Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc.; Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: April 3, 2014 Filed: April 10, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Hunter R. Levi appeals following the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We agree with the district court that the record evidence revealed no disputed issues of material fact on Levi s claims against Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC. See Sturge v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 658 F.3d 832, 839 (8th Cir. 2011) (de novo review). We also find that Levi s claims would have necessarily failed against the other parties he originally named or sought to add later as defendants. Finally, we decline to consider Levi s new arguments and allegations. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
