Latarris Robinson v. Corderro Davis, No. 13-2847 (8th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil Case - civil rights . Grant of summary judgment is affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-2847 ___________________________ Latarris Keith Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Sgt. Corderro Davis, Varner Unit, ADC; Jimmy Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Major Jared Byers, Varner Unit, ADC; Gene Carol Ables, Nurse, Varner Unit, ADC (originally named as Ables); Cynthia Jean Newton, Nurse, Varner Unit, ADC; Captain Mark Stephens, Varner Unit, ADC (originally named as Stevens); Curtis Mienzer, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; Margaret Rector, Psychologist, Varner Unit, ADC (originally named as Rector); Kathryn Bowman, Dr. (originally sued as Bowman); Connie Hubbard; John Doe, Unknown; Larry May, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Wendy Kelly, Arkansas Department of Correction lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff ____________ Submitted: June 23, 2014 Filed: June 26, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Inmate Latarris Keith Robinson appeals following the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Upon careful consideration of the orders Robinson has challenged on appeal, including the grant of summary judgment to certain defendants, see Wise v. Lappin, 674 F.3d 939, 941 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (de novo review), we find no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Fed. R. App. P. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.