Mei Di Cao v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., No. 13-2436 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Petition for Review - Immigration. The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioner's motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-2436 ___________________________ Mei Di Cao lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: April 2, 2014 Filed: April 7, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Chinese citizen Mei Di Cao petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Averianova v. Holder, 592 F.3d 931, 936-37 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
