United States v. Roberts, No. 13-2222 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to one count of transporting a minor in interstate commerce with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. On appeal, defendant appealed his sentence of 120 months imprisonment. Defendant argued that the district court abused its sentencing discretion by failing adequately to explain a substantively unreasonable sentence. The court concluded that the failure-to-explain contention was frivolous where the district court's explanation of its upward variance was more than sufficient. The court also concluded that there was no abuse of the district court's wide sentencing discretion and defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable.
Court Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's contention that the district court failed to adequately explain its sentencing decision is frivolous; sentence was not substantively unreasonable. [ April 02, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.