United States v. Conklin, No. 13-1509 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict where defendant was entitled to attack the credibility of witnesses based on alleged inconsistencies during the trial, but the jury was convinced that defendant committed the assault and that conclusion was reasonable based on the evidence.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.