United States v. Cheryl Anderson, No. 13-1484 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not commit any procedural error or abuse its discretion in imposing sentence upon the revocation of defendant's probation. [ September 23, 2013
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-1484 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Cheryl Y. Anderson, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: September 19, 2013 Filed: September 24, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Cheryl Anderson appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking her probation. She argues only that the district court committed procedural 1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. error by selecting a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts. After careful review, we conclude that the district court based its sentencing decision on appropriate considerations and that no abuse of discretion occurred. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir. 2009) (appellate court reviews probation revocation sentence for abuse of discretion, using same standards as those applied to initial sentencing decisions). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
