Johnson, et al. v. Fink, No. 12-6009 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseDebtors appealed from a bankruptcy court order dismissing their chapter 13 case without prejudice. The court held that, while the final order dismissing the case was timely appealed and was properly before the court, debtors simply did not provide any basis, or even a remote suggestion, that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by ordering their case dismissed. Accordingly, the court affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy court.
Court Description: Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Order dismissing Chapter 13 was not an abuse of the bankruptcy court's discretion, and the order is affirmed; order confirming original plan was not timely appealed and the panel was without jurisdiction to review the order. [ May 01, 2012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.