United States v. Landsdown, No. 12-3732 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for receiving child pornography. The credibility of the testimony at issue was for the jury, and the jury reasonably could have concluded that the government eliminated other potential recipients of the child pornography. Therefore, the court concluded that a reasonable jury could find that defendant knowingly received child pornography. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment and concluded that the evidence was sufficient to convict defendant.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for receiving child pornography.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.