United States v. Lara, No. 12-3694 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled guilty to distributing a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine and subsequently appealed the district court's imposition of his sentence after remand. The court concluded that the district court did not err in denying defendant a two-level minor-role adjustment where it correctly concluded that a U.S.S.G. 3B1.2 reduction was not applicable; the law-of-the-case doctrine did not preclude the district court from imposing the $10,000 fine; the sentence was substantively reasonable; and there were no additional nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment, granted counsel leave to withdraw, and denied the motion for appointment of new counsel.
Court Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see U.S. v. Lara, 690 F.3d. 1079 (8th Cir. 2012). Anders case. On remand for resentencing, the district court did not err in denying defendant a two- level minor-role adjustment; law-of-the case doctrine did not preclude the district court from imposing a fine as this court's prior opinion vacated defendant's sentence and remanded for a de novo resentencing; sentence was substantively reasonable. [ June 19, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.