Roberts v. Holder, Jr., No. 12-3359 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, a native and citizen of the Bahamas, sought review of the BIA's decision affirming the IJ's order of removal. The court concluded that petitioner's third-degree assault conviction in Minnesota constituted an aggravated felony. As an aggravated felon, petitioner was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. 1229b(a)(3). Having held that 8 U.S.C. 1182(h) was susceptible to multiple interpretations, the court deferred to the BIA's reasonable construction that section 1182(h) relief was unavailable for any alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony after acquiring lawful permanent resident status, without regard to the manner in which such status was acquired. Finally, the court rejected petitioner's equal protection challenge to the BIA's construction of section 1182(h) where disagreements among the courts of appeal, or between an agency and one or more of the courts of appeal, would not by itself create an equal protection violation. Accordingly, the court denied the petition for review.
Court Description: Petition for Review - Immigration. The Immigration Judge did not err in finding petitioner was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1229b(a)(3) because his Minnesota state court conviction for third-degree assault constituted a crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 16(a); the court will defer to the BIA's reasonable construction of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182(h)holding that the ineligibility provisions of the section apply to aliens seeking adjustment of status; circuit split over the BIA's construction of the section does not create an Equal Protection Clause violation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.