Richard Litschewski v. Robert Dooley, No. 12-3338 (8th Cir. 2013)

 Annotate this Case

Court Description: Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Defendants' judgment affirmed without comment. [ April 22, 2013

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3338 ___________________________ Richard Litschewski, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, Nancy Litschewski; Aaron Litschewski; Darcy Litschewski; Arica Overby; Steve Overby, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs, v. Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison; John Does; Jane Does; Melinda Johnson, Records Administrator, South Dakota State Penitentiary; Unnamed Construction Co., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls ____________ Submitted: April 18, 2013 Filed: April 23, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Inmate Richard Litschewski appeals the district court s1 adverse judgment in his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action.2 Upon de novo review, see Bahl v. County of Ramsey, 695 F.3d 778, 783 (8th Cir. 2012) (summary judgment); King v. Iowa Dep t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (Prison Litigation Reform Act s administrativeexhaustion provision), we conclude that affirmance is warranted on the merits, see Wood v. SatCom Mktg., LLC, 705 F.3d 823, 827 (8th Cir. 2013) (summary judgment may be affirmed on any basis supported by record). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Litschewski s motion to supplement his brief. _____________________________ 1 The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 2 We have not considered matters Litschewski has waived on appeal. See Coates v. Powell, 639 F.3d 471, 475 n.5 (8th Cir. 2011). -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.