United States v. Rhodes, No. 12-3299 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for using and maintaining a premises for the purpose of distributing and using a controlled substance. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient to convict defendant and the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal, nor did it abuse its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for using and maintaining a residence for the purpose of drug distribution in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 856(a)(1). Judge Loken, concurring.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.